A technical SEO audit is only useful if you actually do something with what it finds — which is why Site Audit doesn't just list issues, it feeds directly into the URL Indexer's re-indexing workflow. Fix a page, and the same audit that flagged it can trigger a re-submission instead of leaving you to remember to do it manually.
It checks pages individually rather than just crawling a sitemap and guessing, which matters most on sites where a handful of high-traffic pages carry most of the SEO weight and a single broken canonical tag or missing meta description is worth fixing immediately rather than waiting for the next full crawl.
If the audit caught something you'd have otherwise missed, or the re-indexing handoff saved you a manual step, we'd like to hear about it.